ПРОБЛЕМИ ПРАВОЗАСТОСУВАННЯ У СФЕРІ ВИКОРИСТАННЯ ТА ЗДІЙСНЕННЯ ПРАВА НА СВОБОДУ МИРНИХ ЗІБРАНЬ: ПРАКТИКА ЗАГАЛЬНИХ СУДІВ ПЕРШОЇ ІНСТАНЦІЇ У СПРАВАХ ПРО АДМІНІСТРАТИВНІ ПРАВОПОРУШЕННЯ В УМОВАХ ПРАВОВОГО РЕЖИМУ ВОЄННОГО СТАНУ

Abstract

The article highlights the topical issues of the quality of justification and motivation of the decisions of the general courts of first instance based on the results of consideration of cases of administrative offenses regarding the violation of the order of organization and holding of meetings, rallies, street marches and demonstrations under the conditions of the legal regime of martial law in Ukraine. Legal theories always need their empirical confir-mation regarding the ability to regulate relevant social relations. Rights, freedoms and in-terests are the lines that no legal order and legal regime can neglect. One of such markers of the establishment of democracy in society and in the institutional and functional systems of the state is the right to freedom of peaceful assembly. In this regard, it is important for state bodies to observe the declared mechanisms (algorithms) for limiting or prohibiting the ex-ercise of the right to freedom of peaceful assembly. Despite everything, disputes arise in the social environment regarding the use and exercise of the right to freedom of peaceful as-sembly, in which courts of general jurisdiction act as arbitrators. Hence, trust in such court decisions is possible only in cases of proper justification and motivation by the courts of their decisions, formation of a system of norms based on the constitutional provisions of the legal order in the country, which will reflect legal certainty and legal predictability in the regulation of homogeneous social relations. Therefore, the study of rulings in cases of ad-ministrative offenses of general courts of first instance will reveal those gaps and conflicts in argumentation, which must be filled in the future to create conditions for understanding the effective legal regulation of the use and exercise of the right to freedom of peaceful as-sembly.